MATTER OF HAMILTON v. Monaghan
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*879Order affirmed, upon the ground that the Appellate Division had power to direct that the facts be tried out instead of being decided on conflicting and incomplete allegations of affidavits. We pass upon no other questions. The question certified on appellant-respondent’s appeal is answered in the affirmative. The question certified on respondent-appellant’s appeal is answered in the negative. No opinion.
Concur: Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Van Voorhis, JJ. Conway, Ch. J., dissents in the following opinion in which Froessel, J., concurs. Taking no- part: Burke, J.
2Cited by3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Elmer Burke, Relator-Appellant v. Wilfred L. Denno, Warden of Sing Sing PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United States ex rel. Burke v. DennoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- MATTER OF HAMILTON v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1956