Legal Opinion

Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau v. United States

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 10, 1943No. 622PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOWEN, District Judge.

This is an action by plaintiffs, a motor carrier freight traffic bureau and a motor *377common carrier of interstate freight, to enjoin and set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission of October 13, 1941, refusing to set aside certain newly promulgated railroad rates. The United States and the Commission have answered, and a number of railroads which participated in promulgating the questioned rates have intervened as defendants.

One of such rates promulgated in schedules filed June 15, 1939, is described in I. & S. No. 4648 as a carload all-commodity rate on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. United States v. Chicago Heights Trucking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Anchor Coal Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API