Legal Opinion

Mutual Supply Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 23, 1960No. C.D. 2155PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

The issue in these two cases, consolidated for purposes of trial, is whether certain vegetable preparations are pickled. Plaintiff claims they are. If so, they are entitled to the benefit of the 17% percent modified rate under the Presidential proclamation of May 13, 1950 (T.D. 52476), pursuant to the Annecy Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52378), effective May 30, 1950, unless eo nomine excluded. The provision for modified rate, under paragraph 775, is as follows:

Vegetables (including horseradish), if pickled, or packed in salt…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chong Kee Jan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Enbun Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. Enbun Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. Hosoda Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Hoyt v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API