Legal Opinion

Ratliffe v. Hartsfield Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 16, 1935No. 10540PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hutcheson, Justice.

The plaintiff contends that the investment certificate does not come within the purview of the securities act, because it was issued by the plaintiff as a building and loan association or like association under the Code of 1933, § 16-101, and as such should be considered as a class A or class B security under said act. The act of 1930 (Ga. L. 1930, p. 351) defines “securities” as “stocks, bonds, debentures, notes, certificates of participation, certificates of shares of interest, preorganization certificates and sub*666scriptions, certificates evidencing shares in trust estates…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Cook v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Savannah Real Estate, Loan & Building Co. v. SilverbergSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Felton v. Highlands Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. PopeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mechanics Loan & Savings Co. v. MathersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Jones v. NashCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Cooper v. Southern Discount CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. Ratliffe v. Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API