Legal Opinion
Native American Council of Tribes v. Weber
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 19, 2012No. CIV. 09-4182-KESPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, Native American Council of Tribes (NACT), Blaine Brings Plenty, and Clayton Creek, (collectively NACT or plaintiffs), brought suit against defendants, Douglas Weber and Dennis Kaemingk,1 alleging a violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), the American Indian Religious Freedom Act, the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and international law. The court granted summary judgment on the American Indian Religious Freedom Act and international law claims and denied summary judgment on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Sossamon v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Randy Haight v. LaDonna ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Creek v. WeberDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2017
- Randy Haight v. LaDonna ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Randy Haight v. LaDonna ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- St. Timothy's Episcopal Church v. City of BrookingsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024