Legal Opinion

Hempy v. Bank of Tokyo of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1960No. 16867PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In loaning the now bankrupt Lee company in excess of $7,000, the Bank of Tokyo took as security two passenger cars and one light truck belonging to the debtor. The vehicles, by the terms of the note, were “assign [ed], transfer [red] and deliver [ed]” to the bank. The debt- or retained possession of the cars and truck. Promptly after the pledge was made, the Department of Motor Vehicles of the state of California issued certificates of ownership, each reciting that the bank was the legal owner and the debtor-partnership was the registered owner.

*94There was no compliance by the debtor or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Embree Uranium Co. v. LiebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hempy v. Bank of Tokyo of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API