Legal Opinion

Cargo Carriers, Incorporated v. Richmond Steel Company, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1959No. 7743PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

In this action for damages for breach of a contract to construct steel barges, tried to the court without a jury, the District Judge concluded that the contract had been rescinded by mutual consent. There is no great disagreement among the parties as to what was done and said, the issue being whether or not all of the facts and circumstances warrant the inferences drawn and the conclusion reached by the District Court. We think they do not.

Cargo Carriers, Inc. operates a fleet of barges from points in the upper Mississippi Valley eastward through the Great Lakes to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tuso v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Allardice v. McCainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Van Keulen v. SealanderWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. F. W. Means & Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API