Legal Opinion

Schwass v. Riverton Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2010No. Docket No. 292737PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners appeal by right an order of the Michigan Tax Tribunal (MTT) affirming respondent’s assessment of their real property. We affirm. This appeal has been decided without oral argument. MCR 7.214(E).

Petitioners are two husband-and-wife couples, Roy and Susan Hackert and Theodore and Joan Schwass. All the real estate at issue was owned by two partnerships, Tero Farms and KaJo Farms, of which Roy Hackert and Theodore Schwass were the only partners. The partnerships deeded the real estate parcels to one or the other of the individual partners and their respective spouses. Following these…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cowles v. Bank WestMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Detroit v. Ambassador Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Wengel v. WengelMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Signature Villas, LLC v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Tmw Enterprises Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Detroit Lions, Inc. v. City of DearbornMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Lyle Schmidt Farm LLC v. Township of MendonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Toll Northville Ltd. Partnership v. Northville TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API