Garmire v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
From the LaGrange Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
There are two counts in the indictment upon which the appellant was convicted; one charges the forgery of the instrument of writing set forth, and the other charges the appellant with feloniously uttering the forged instrument. The instrument reads thus:
“ LaGrange, June 19th, 1881.
“ Mr. Allen — Please let A. Garmire have team to go to
Mongo, and charge same to me. T. Hudson.”
We regard this instrument as within the provisions of our statute defining the crime of forgery, for we think it is not merely a request for the delivery of property, but that it is a *445writing obligatory promising to pay…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Harding v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- State v. . KeeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hollars v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Goodman v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Santolini v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
- Shannon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- State v. GulletteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.