Legal Opinion

Parlato v. Thomas

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Salvatore Parlato against Hugh Thomas. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover the value of a horse, which he delivered to the defendant upon the understanding that the defendant was to keep it in his stable for $5 per month. Under the agreement the plaintiff was to feed the horse. The horse was stolen. The relation existing between the plaintiff and the defendant was that of bailor and bailee for mutual benefit. The defendant’s duty as bailee merely required him to exercise ordinary care, and .he was not liable for the loss of the horse, in the absence of proof that the loss was occasioned by his negligence or wrongful act. Stewart v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Cramer v. KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. BlumbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  2. Graber v. RubinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API