Legal Opinion

Manson v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United Workmen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 20, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Plaintiff, tbe person designated by Albert G. Manson in his certificate of membérship in defendant to receive the sum of $2,000, upon his death, brought this action in the district court for Bamsey county, to recover that sum. The action was tried before. Wilkin, J., a jury being waived, and judgment was ordered for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

The defendant is an 'incorporation, having among its purposes the creation of a fund for the benefit of its members during sickness, and, in case-of death, the payment of a stipulated sum to such persons as maybe 'designated, thus- providing'a plan *510of life insurance for its members. The fund created for this purpose is under the control of and administered by the corporation. Upon the, death of a member in good standing, the beneficiary whom he may have designated is entitled to receive from this fund the sum of $2,000. This fund is created and maintained by assessments upon the individual…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bauer v. Samson LodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Elliot v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United WorkmenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
  3. Dunn v. Detroit Federation of MusiciansMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Morey v. MonkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Runyan v. RunyanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API