Legal Opinion

Fridenstine v. Idaho Department of Administration

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1999No. 24232PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order by the Idaho Personnel Commission upholding the dismissal of A.E. Fridenstine from his position as Chief of the Idaho Bureau of Risk Management. The district court affirmed the Commission’s order. We likewise affirm.

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Fridenstine served as Chief of the Bureau of Risk Management (BRM) from 1979 until his dismissal in 1995. Pamela Ahrens, the Director of the Idaho Department of Administration, dismissed Fridenstine on May 17, 1995 based upon ten different allegations of misconduct. Following an eight-day evidentiary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Bowler v. Board of Trustees of School District No. 392Idaho Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Idaho Department of Correction v. AndersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Whittier v. Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Karr v. BermeosoloIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API