Legal Opinion

Jarreau v. Diaz

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1933No. 14064Published

1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.

Joseph A. Jarreau, plaintiff, alleges that he was employed by defendant as a salesman at $150 per month, that he has been discharged, and that there is now due him on account of salary $130, and that he is also entitled to $4.18, which he necessarily expended for account of Diaz, defendant," in the course of the employment. Diaz admits that Jar-reau was employed by him, but contends that the employment was on a commission basis, that no salary was to be paid, the understanding being that Jarreau was to receive 50 cents for each ton of coke sold by him. Diaz contends that the misunderstanding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New Orleans Canal & Banking Co. v. Leeds & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
  2. Laville v. Succession of ParkersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Meyer v. LudelingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  4. Succession of MagiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  5. Succession of McLaughlinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API