Scotch v. Hurst
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant, Joe Scotch, appeals from an order denying his motion for new trial or amendment of judgment and from trial judgment quieting title to certain lands in plaintiffs, Emris Hurst, Harriet Clarke, and Peggy Arthur. We affirm in part; reverse in part; and remand.
In 1946, Harry Hurst purchased approximately thirty-five acres of land in Shelby County, Alabama, taking a warranty deed from George Huddleston. Hurst gave Huddleston a purchase money mortgage on the land to finance the purchase. In 1947, while the property was still under mortgage, Hurst and his wife, Juanita Hurst, sold a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ussery v. DarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Dallas Compress Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Duncan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Abney v. AbneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Ward v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Carroll & Associates, PA v. GalindoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Williams v. HurstSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Salters v. SaltersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983