Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hubbard v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 14, 1996No. A95A2510Published

1DissentRuffin, Judge

I must respectfully dissent because it is well settled in this state that a trial judge must charge a defendant’s sole defense, even if no request is made, and failure to do so constitutes reversible error. The majority’s holding stands in direct conflict with an unbroken line of case law pre-dating this court’s decision in Glaze v. State, 2 Ga. App. 704 (58 SE 1126) (1907). In Glaze, the court set forth the principles which have guided Georgia courts for nearly 90 years as follows: “It seems to have been uniformly held by the Supreme Court that the omission to submit the controlling issue in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Glaze v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Pearson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Conner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Micheli v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API