Harrison v. State

1. If a ground of a motion for a new trial which alleged error in the admission of evidence, and which stated that “the objection that it was merely an opinion, a conclusion, and for that reason it should be left to the jury,” sufficiently showed whether this objection was made and passed on by the presiding judge when the evidence was offered, still where part of the evidence claimed to have been illegal was admissible and the objection was to the whole, its' admission will not require a new trial. Murphy v. State, 122 Ga. 149.

2. The evidence complained of was substantially repeated several…