Legal Opinion · Dissent

Norma Andalis Bagamasbad v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 8, 1976No. 74-1440Published

1DissentVan Dusen, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent because I believe that the majority opinion extends the scope of judicial review of action by the Attorney General under Section 245 of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255, beyond that authorized by the applicable congressional statutes, as implemented by Executive Regulations and construed by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Unlike the majority, I believe that the statutory language in 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a) and analogous case law only requires the Attorney General to examine the facts and decide whether to exercise his “discretion” on an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API