Wright v. Wright

(after stating the case as above).

The evidence amply supports findings 1 and 2. These findings and other undisputed evidence in the case established that the plaintiff H. J. Wright acquired an equitable title to the 100-acre tract by virtue of a parol trust, which title was superior to the legal title vested in the defendant F. P. Wright. Citation of authority to such effect is unnecessary.

This being the case, the judgment in plaintiffs’ favor is correct unless it be shown that H. J. Wright’s equitable title passed to F. P. Wright. The contention of the latter in this connection is, that in…