Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Board of Pharmacy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On certiorari to the District Court of Jersey City.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depüe, J.

■ The second section of ‘^An act to regulate the practice of pharmacy provides t-hat/“ any person not being or having in his employ a registered pharmacist, who shall * *• * keep a pharmacy or store for retailing or compounding medicines, * * * shall, for each and every such offence, be liable to a penalty of $50, such penalty to be sued for and recovered by the board of pharmacy * * * in the same manner provided by the statutes of this, state for the recovery of penalties in other quitam actions.”,/ Rev.,p. 816.

The plaintiff in certiorari was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners v. BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Hurlburt v. BanksNew York Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sawran v. LennonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Township of Princeton v. BardinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  3. In re Initiative Petition No. 191Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Anthony v. ReaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. State v. MartinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API