Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 21, 1992No. 92-00518PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

We affirm Russell’s conviction and the sentence imposed thereon. In our review of the record, however, we find it necessary to remand this case to the trial court for entry of an order which permits Russell, who was designated by the trial court to be a habitual offender but was sentenced to a guidelines sentence, to receive the appropriate gain time1 while serving *1343his sentence and for modification of the written judgment and sentence.

King v. State, 597 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (en banc), review denied, 602 So.2d 942 (Fla.1992) held that the trial court is required to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Russell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Nesmith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API