Arvinger v. State

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

A jury found Deangelo Arvinger guilty of armed robbery.1 Arvinger appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in refusing to give a requested jury instruction. He also claims that the verdict form was misleading, confusing, and inaccurate. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Viewed favorably to the verdict,2 the evidence shows that Ahmed Khan was robbed of over $6,000 in a bank parking lot. According to Khan, he exited his car holding a bag of deposits from the convenience store that he owned. An individual approached him from behind, hit him in the head with a hard object,…