Legal Opinion

Schrunk v. Bearden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 1983No. A-8301-00247; CA A28056PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiff, the District Attorney of Multnomah County, appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus directed to the defendant judge. Plaintiff seeks to compel defendant to dismiss a petition for diversion by a person charged with driving while under the influence of intoxicants. We conclude that plaintiff is entitled to issuance of the writ, and we reverse.

Davis, the DUII defendant, filed a petition for diversion pursuant to ORS 484.445 et seq. Plaintiff objected to the petition on the ground that Davis had been convicted of DUII within the ten-year period before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ricco v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API