Legal Opinion · Dissent

Melino v. National Grange Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 27, 1995Published

1Dissent

Spain, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. As the majority has stated, it is well-settled law that where a mortgagee successfully bids the full amount of the secured debt at a foreclosure sale, it loses its insurable interest in the premises and may not recover under the loss payable clause contained in the fire insurance policy (see, Whitestone Sav. & Loan Assn. v Allstate Ins. Co., 28 NY2d 332, 334-335; Sportsmen’s Park v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 97 AD2d 893, 894-895, affd 63 NY2d 998). The rationale expressed in Whitestone Sav. & Loan Assn. v Allstate Ins. Co. (supra),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitestone Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Sportsmen's Park, Inc. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Sportsmen's Park, Inc. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Morgan v. Ellenville Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Bellusci v. Citibank N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API