Legal Opinion

Ford Clinic, Inc. v. Potter

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 6, 2000No. A00A2066PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Chief Judge.

William Potter III sued Ford Clinic, Inc. for alleged breach of an oral employment contract. Ford Clinic moved for summary judgment, which was denied by the trial court. We granted interlocutory review of the summary judgment denial. Because any alleged oral contract was either for two years and barred by the statute of frauds or for an indefinite period of time and terminable at will, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Ford Clinic’s motion for summary judgment.

On appeal of the grant of summary judgment, this court applies a de novo review of the evidence to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Moore v. FOOD ASSOCIATES, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. O'NEAL v. Home Town Bank of Villa RicaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Marshall v. W. E. Marshall Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Dong v. Shepeard Community Blood CenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Balmer v. Elan Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Clarke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Parker v. Crider Poultry, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  4. Greenway Insurance Agency v. GFA Business Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Pickle Logging, Inc. v. Georgia Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API