Legal Opinion

Looney v. Gibraltar Savings Ass'n

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided July 31, 1985No. 07-85-0074-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

Jack Looney, Jr. and his wife, Elizabeth Looney, bring this appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to reinstate their cause of action, which the court had dismissed for want of prosecution. The Looneys’ reinstatement motion was denied because the court, albeit finding all facts mandating reinstatement, ruled that it had lost jurisdiction of the matter. Determining that the court had jurisdiction at the time it signed the order denying the reinstatement motion, we reverse and render.

On 29 June 1981, the Looneys, represented by attorney R.C. Hamilton, filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Blue Ridge Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1984
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Harris, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Levit v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Shell Pipeline Corp. v. Coastal States Trading, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  3. Pope v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. In re MerinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. Levit v. Adams, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API