Legal Opinion

Aegerter v. Hayes

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1929No. File No. 6283PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORIARTY, C.

This is an action in forcible entry and detainer, the complaint alleging that the plaintiff is the owner of the real propei^r involved, and that the defendant is a tenant holding over after the expiration of the term of his lease."

The plaintiff had judgment in justice court. From that judgment the defendant appealed and a trial de novo was had in the circuit court. This trial was to a jury, and resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant.

From that judgment and from an order denying a new trial the plaintiff has appealed to this court.

The assignments of error raise…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Minneapolis Iron Store Co. v. BranumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  2. William Weisman Holding Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Towles v. HamiltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Kelley v. KelleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Vidger v. NolinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Heiser v. RodwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bell v. SellevoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  3. Skjoldal v. MyrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Moncur v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Christy Et Ux. v. Guild Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API