Legal Opinion
Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. Fid. Land Value Assur. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 22, 1933No. Appeal, 15PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Linn,
June 30, 1933 :
The question is whether appellant was engaged in the insurance business, as the Commonwealth contends. Incorporated under the law of Delaware for the purpose of engaging in the real estate business, it registered in this state, May 1, 1930, as a foreign corporation, so engaged. It admits that it “is not authorized by its charter to operate as an insurance company......in the state of its incorporation or......elsewhere, and that it has not been licensed to do business in this Commonwealth in accordance with......the Act of May 17, 1921, P. L. 682, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Commonwealth v. VroomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Commonwealth v. Equitable Beneficial Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Commonwealth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United National Insurance v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- R.V.I. Guar. Co. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015
- Hatfield v. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the WorldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Clayton v. Village of Oak ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Hunt v. Public Mut. Ben. FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.