Legal Opinion
Gordon v. City of Louisville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided May 26, 1910PublishedCited by 19 opinions
CASE 58. — ACTION BY PULTON, GORDON AND OTHERS AGAINST THE CITY OP LOUISVILLE'. Appeal from Jefferson. Circuit Court (Cliancery Branch, Second Division). Samuel B. Kirby, Judge. Judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
*443Opinion op the Court by
Judge Carroll
Affirming.
The only question in this ease is the validity of an ordinance of the city of Louisville reading:
“Section 1. That hereafter the following licenses shall be paid into the sinking fund of the city of Louisville for the purposes of the sinking fund, for doing the businesses, following the callings, occupations and professions, or exhibiting the articles hereinafter named, in the city of Louisville. * * *”
Sec, 21. Every person, firm or corporation engaged in the business of buying, selling or negotiating the purchase or sale of goods, wares and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hager v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Brown-Foreman Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- City of Louisville v. Sagalowski & SonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Strater Bros. Tobacco Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Raydure v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- City of Danville v. Quaker Maid, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Kentucky Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Moore v. State Bd. of Charities and CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- City of Newport v. French Bros. Bauer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.