Legal Opinion

Hinkel v. His Creditors

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1883Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court pf the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

This was a proceeding by Hinkel, the respondent, to be adjudged an insolvent debtor, and discharged from his debts. The proceeding was commenced under the provisions of the Statute of Insolvency passed March 4, 1852. In the schedule filed by the petitioner, Moody, the appellant herein, was named as a creditor to whom the insolvent owed a balance of four thousand dollars upon a promissory note. At a meeting of the creditors of the insolvent on the day fixed by the court for the appointment of an assignee, pursuant to notice given for that purpose, Moody was elected assignee. As such he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poehlmann v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Sanborn v. CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Davenport v. His CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API