Legal Opinion

Seminole Casualty Insurance Co. v. Mastrominas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 13, 2009No. 2D08-3325PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KHOUZAM, Judge.

Seminole Casualty Insurance Company seeks certiorari review of a discovery order requiring it to produce certain items in its claims file. Because the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in ordering Seminole to produce these items, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the court’s order.

Georgia Mastrominas, Nikolaos Mastro-minas, and Fotini H. Mastrominas sued Seminole after Seminole denied coverage for an accident that occurred on July 8, 2001. Seminole claimed that the policy had been cancelled and was not in effect on the date of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. BoecherSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. Northup v. AckenSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Government Employees Insurance Company v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  5. GEICO General Ins. Co. v. HoyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maplewood Partners, L.P. v. Indian Harbor InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
  2. State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. AloniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Nationwide Insurance Co. of Florida v. DemmoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Zirkelbach Construction Inc. v. RajanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Premier Diagnostic Centers, LLC, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API