Legal Opinion

Willis v. Midland Finance Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1958No. 36958PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge;

1. The one special ground of the amended motion for new trial complains that the trial court erred in failing to admit certain evidence. It is unnecessary to pass on this ground of the amended motion for new trial inasmuch as it appears that the defendant, Julia Mae Willis, testified to the same facts and no objection was made. See in this connection, Ray v. Hutchinson, 27 Ga. App. 448, 449 (108 S. E. 815), and Jones v. State, 27 Ga. App. 574 (4) (109 S. E. 515). If the exclusion of the evidence was error it was harmless error where uncontradicted evidence to the same effect…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Welfare Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Hodges v. CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Ray v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Peoples Bank v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Young Men's Christian Assn. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Mitchell v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Mitchell v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Brooks v. FincherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API