Legal Opinion

Spence v. Spence

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1939No. Calendar 40,493PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

The parties to this suit were divorced in September, 1930. The decree as then entered was construed, clarified and modified upon motion of plaintiff heard and decided October 12, 1938. No appeal was taken by defendant from the order of the court construing and modifying the decree as first entered in this cause. As thus construed or modified the decree contains the following provision:

“And it is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that said H. Wibirt Spence pay to Harriette C. Spence, the several sums of money set forth and mentioned on his part to be paid in the agreement executed by and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shafer v. ShaferMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Tessmer v. TessmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Van Dommelen v. Van DommelenMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Green v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oknaian v. OknaianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Kull v. LoschMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Speer v. SpeerLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1947
  4. Clark v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Mertens v. MertensMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API