Legal Opinion

Dunn v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following issues were submitted by his Honor to the jury, and responded to by them as set out:

1. Was plaintiff injured by the negligence of defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

2. What damage, if any, has plaintiff sustained? Answer: Seven hundred and fifty dollars.

From the judgment rendered upon the verdict the defendant appealed to this Court.

The only evidence at the trial was the testimony of the plaintiff, (314) examined in his own behalf, and was as follows: "I am the plaintiff. On 14 January, 1908, I was a member of the bridge force and was engaged in work for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. Simpson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Lassiter v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Wright v. Thompson & Moseley, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Simpson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. House v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Winborne v. Interstate Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Rogerson v. . HontzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Miller v. Granite County Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API