Legal Opinion

Mailey v. Rubin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1957No. Appeal, 110PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

John J. Mailey, the plaintiff in this case, entered into a written agreement with the defendants, Alexander and Edna Rubin, for the purchase of a tract of land which he intended to subdivide into lots. The contract carried the provision: “Premises to be conveyed clear of all liens and incumbrances, excepting existing restrictions and easements, if any. It is understood there is no Deed restriction prohibiting the dividing of the land, and that it can be divided and approved by Lower Merion Township according to existing zoning.” After making the agreed-upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Onofrey v. WolliverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Decker v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Koch v. MatterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cusamano v. Anthony M. DiLucia, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Woytek v. Benjamin Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Bachman v. HechtDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1986
  4. Hanover Bank of Penn. v. United Penn Bk.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Blumberg v. DiMARCOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API