Legal Opinion

In re Kaufmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, P. J.:

The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law at the October, 1905, ter,m of the Appellate Division, First Department, and has practiced as such attorney since his admission.

He was joined as a defendant in the same indictment referred to in Matter of Lindheim (195 App. Div. 827), handed down herewith, and was convicted at the same time and for the same offense and received the same punishment.

It follows for the reasons set forth in said opinion that he , must be disbarred.

Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Greenbaum, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re LindheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re AckersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. In re KaufmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. In re KaufmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API