Legal Opinion

George Dagnesses v. Target Media Partners

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 29, 2017No. 16-17802 Non-Argument CalendarUnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

George Dagnesses believed his boss had it out for him. She belittled and accosted him, he felt, and regularly made negative remarks about men. When his boss eventually fired him, Dagnesses sued his former employer, Target Media Partners and Target Media Partners Operating Company (collectively, “TMP”), for sex discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., bringing various state law claims as well. The district court granted TMP summary judgment on all counts. Upon review, we reverse as to Dagnesses’ Florida law contract claim, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. David Sapuppo, Theresa Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Holifield v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brittany Sneed v. Arrow Electric, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
  2. PLZ Corp. f/k/a Precise Packaging, LLC v. Jeunesse, Inc. f/k/a/ Jeunesse, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026
  3. Robinson Miller v. Montgomery County Board of Education (CONSENT)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API