Legal Opinion
Ahmed v. Trupin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1992No. 89 Civ. 7645 (RWS)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Stuart Becker & Co., P.C. (“Stuart Becker”), has moved pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for dismissal of the claims against it, and defendant Eisenberg Honig & Fogler (“Eisenberg Honig”) seeks similar relief pursuant to Rules' 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), 9(b), and 56. For the reasons set forth below, their motions are granted, and the claims against them dismissed.
The Parties
The underlying disputes and principal parties that are the subject of this and related actions are recounted in the prior opinions of this Court,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Gurfein v. Sovereign GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Maywalt v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.