Legal Opinion

Pennell v. Hinman

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Bill to foreclose a mortgage. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Gridley, J.

The bill in this cause was filed in the late court of chancery, before the vice chancellor of the seventh circuit, to foreclose a mortgage executed by Sampson Jaquith to Henry W. Schroeppel, for the purchase price of lot No. 65 in the 16th township of Scriba’s patent. The conveyance to Jaquith, and the mortgage executed to Schroeppel, bore date on the 13th of April, 1839, and the mortgage, with the collateral bond, was assigned to the plaintiffs on the 16th of July, 1841. Prior to the conveyance by Schroeppel to Jaquith, two judgments were recovered against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Welland Canal Co. v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Dowe v. SchuttNew York Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. President, Directors & Co. of Mechanics' Bank v. New-York & New Haven RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Roose v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Strong v. StricklandNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Brown v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Mechanics' Bank v. New York & New Haven Rail RoadThe Superior Court of New York City · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API