Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Baker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal: Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtChittenden, J.

This cause was submitted on a motion made by the defendants for judgment in their favor upon the pleadings. The substance of the pleadings, so far as need be stated for the purposes of this opinion, is as follows: Newton D. Baker, Thomas Coughlin and William F. Thompson, as mayor, director of finance and president of the council, respectively, of the city of Cleveland, constitute the sinking fund commission of said city, and on the 22d day of October, 1914, said commission duly adopted the following resolution :

“Resolved, That for the purpose of accumulating funds to meet the obligations of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Tony Fisher v. Jordan HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  3. Angelo Clark v. Robert CoupeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  4. Owner Operator Indep. Drivers Ass'n, Inc. v. Pa. Tpk. Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  5. Anthuis v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API