Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Medline Indus., Inc.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided January 18, 2019No. Civil No. 1:17cv118-HSO-RHWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Medline Industries, Inc.'s Motion [55] for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Richard K. Rogers alleges Defendant discriminated against him based on his age when it terminated his employment. After due consideration of the record, Defendant's Motion, and relevant legal authority, the Court is of the opinion that Defendant's Motion [55] for Summary Judgment should be granted in part and denied in part. Defendant Medline Industries, Inc., is entitled to judgment as a matter of law as to the disparate-impact age…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Baptist Memorial Hospital-Golden Triangle, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2025
  2. Shumate v. ChaoDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API