Chapman v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §801 (d.), provides that compensation shall be payable to an employe who becomes unemployed and who is “able to work and available for suitable work.” The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review held that David R. Chapman, Jr. was ineligible for compensation because he was not able to work and not available for suitable work. We must affirm that decision.
Mr. Chapman was employed as a meat inspector by the United States Department of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Koba v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Baker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Molton Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Rodrigo v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- Genetin v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Wincek v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- McCurdy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Gonzalez v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- E. Gosner, Sr. v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.