Legal Opinion · Dissent

Goffe v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 1978No. 3-876A198Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

HOFFMAN, J.

The majority opinion reverses the judgment of the trial court on the grounds that defendant was not informed by the trial court of his right to pauper attorney and was prejudiced by certain comments made by the prosecuting attorney to the jury. Finding that I cannot agree with either of these grounds for reversal, I respectfully dissent.

IC 1971, 35-4.1-l-2(a) (Burns Code Ed.), provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

“The defendant shall not be called upon to plead until the court has advised him of his right to retain counsel and his right to be provided with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Goffe v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API