Legal Opinion
State v. Carter
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 4, 1979No. 70PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
Defendant has brought forward a single assignment of error. By it he contends that the court erroneously admitted into evidence statements made to the police by him during the course of custodial interrogation. He argues that one cannot knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his rights under Miranda when he has not been informed of the charges which the police are investigating.
Counsel for defendant has ably urged that we adopt the rule set forth in Schenk v. Ellsworth, 293 F. Supp. 26 (D. Mont. 1968). There the court held that a person being interrogated must be…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RichmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Funicello v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Willie AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. FalbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Beasley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. GoffWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Andrew Thomas Carter, Sr. v. Sam P. Garrison Attorney General of the State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.