Crow v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The indictment considered by the Court of Appeals charges forgery of a written instrument set out in it in the form of an affidavit purporting to have been executed '.by a witness in a civil suit, in which affiant is made to swear that the certificate issued to him was lost or misplaced and not sold or transferred by him.
The Court of Appeals held that •the indictment was insufficient in not alleging extrinsic facts showing that the instrument, if genuine, would affect some ■.financial or property right, on the authority of Williams v. State, 90 Ala. 649, 8 So. 825, and other…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rembert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Burden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wyatt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Gooch v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Crow v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
- Gooch v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Warren v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.