Legal Opinion
Joseph v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 18, 2004No. 4D02-4070PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.
Kevin M. Joseph appeals his conviction of the sale of MDMA, commonly known as ecstasy. We affirm, finding no error in the prosecutor’s cross-examination of Joseph.
Joseph 'was charged with trafficking in MDMA.
The State’s Case at Trial
The state’s case at trial established that Detective Golino of the Port St. Lucie Police Department met with a confidential informant (Cl) to purchase 400 MDMA pills from Joseph, at $9 a pill. The plan was to meet Joseph in a McDonald’s parking lot, with the detective giving Joseph the money for the pills.
The Cl received a phone call and informed the detective…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Knowles v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- United States v. Arun GaindCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. GainesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Boatwright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Page v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- M.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- M.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019