Legal Opinion

Gillitt v. Truax

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Dakota county, Crosby, j., presiding, and from an order refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

The questions raised in this ease are upon the validity of a judgment rendered by a justice of the peace, and of a levy of the execution thereon upon growing grain. The objections to the judgment are that the complaint on which it was rendered does not justify so large a judgment; this, if true, was only error, not affecting the jurisdiction, and does not affect the judgment in a collateral action; also’ that, as shown by the justice’s docket, on the return-day of the summons, April 11th, after the plaintiff had filed his complaint, defendant not appearing, the justice, to enable plaintiff to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lane v. InnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Santerre v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  3. Vaule v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Gibbs v. Alger, Smith & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  5. Lloyd v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API