Legal Opinion

State v. Ogle

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1983No. J81-2065; CA A26378PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for failure to appear in the first degree. ORS 162.205. The issue is the scope of the lawyer-client privilege. OEC 503. We affirm.

The trial court ordered defendant’s former attorney to testify whether he had sent a letter to defendant, notifying him of the arraignment date on pending forgery charges. The trial court sustained defendant’s objection to the introduction of the letter, accepting the attorney’s representation that it contained other matter, including legal advice to defendant. The attorney’s testimony was limited to whether he had sent defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. OgleOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. OgleOregon Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API