Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Iowa v. Jayel Antrone Coleman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 10, 2017No. 15–0752Published

1DissentWaterman, Justice

I respectfully dissent and would affirm the district court ruling denying Coleman’s motion to suppress, as did the court' of appeals. Until today, a police officer who lawfully stopped a motorist could ask to see his or her driver’s license, especially when the officer knew, the driver was not the car’s registered owner. Almost all low-*302ans, I believe, would find this activity completely unobjectionable and, indeed, mundane. But not the majority. Instead, our court has determined that this act of routine traffic enforcement violates the search and seizure provision of the Iowa Constitution.…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API