State v. Burnham
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EPHRAIM HANSON, Justice.
The defendant was tried and convicted in Davis county on an information charging him with the commission of a felony. The record shows that the requisite number of jurors duly qualified on their voir dire examination to serve as jurors in the case. When defendant’s attorney was requested to exercise his first peremptory challenge, he objected and insisted that R. S. Utah 1933, 104-24-12, of the Code of Civil Procedure be followed in impaneling the jury. The objection was overruled and the impaneling of the jury was proceeded with in accordance with the practice in use…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Salt Lake City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- Cannon v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. HamblinUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Floyd v. Western Surgical Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- State v. BaroneUtah Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.