Legal Opinion

Associated Credit Exchange v. Barnett

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1927No. Docket No. 5881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

A proceeding in certiorari has been instituted herein for the purpose of reviewing and having annulled an order made by respondent, as justice of the peace, setting aside a default judgment, the ground of the application being that the motion pursuant to which said order was made was not presented within the limitation of time fixed by statute.

The facts are as follows: Petitioner brought an action in the justice’s court in claim and delivery to recover possession of a sewing-machine or its alleged value, $122. Although personally served with summons, the defendants failed to appear, and on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olcese v. Justice's Court of the First Judicial Twp.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. McCue v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Storey v. MuellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API